The United Nations Dispute Tribunal, established by the UN General Assembly and operational since July 1, 2009, has issued a decision in Bertucci v. Secretary-General, criticizing the disciplinary proceedings against a former staff member and awarding him compensation for violation of his due process rights. This decision is important because it sheds some light on the administrative procedures within the UN and the inefficient manner in which some disputes are handled internally.
As the decision in Bertucci highlights, the judges appointed by the General Assembly to hear complaints by the UN staff have openly disapproved of the UN’s continued violation of the Tribunal’s orders, including orders to allow staff members access to information necessary for their cases. In Bertucci, the applicant, a former UN employee, was informed shortly before his retirement from the UN that almost $14,000 would be withheld from him due to “pending disciplinary proceedings concerning allegations of mismanagement that had resulted in financial loss.” The applicant complained that he was unable to answer the charges against him because important background information in the form of an internal report was withheld by the UN. He also asked that his contract with the UN be extended until the matter was completely resolved. The organization, however, continued to withhold the requested report and rejected the applicant’s request for extension of his employment contract.
Judge Adams, who was hearing the case and whose decision is final and binding, pointed out that mandatory disciplinary measures and procedures were not followed in Bertucci, leading to an “extremely unfortunate” situation for both the UN and the applicant. Furthermore, the continued uncertainty surrounding the applicant’s case only worsened his position: “The applicant here is in an impossible position, entirely resulting from the Administration’s own making, although it is impossible to deduce whether its delay is caused by indecision about whether to proceed at all or, perhaps, what is the appropriate process for doing so.”
In the end, Judge Adams found that the applicant’s procedural rights were violated but that the funds were appropriately withheld:
[T]he preponderance of evidence establishes that the applicant’s entitlements were lawfully withheld, in that the report disclosed matters which were objectively capable of justifying the conclusion that there was reason to believe he had been guilty of gross negligence resulting in financial loss, even though he may, on fuller examination of the relevant facts, have been found to be entirely innocent.
Judge Adams awarded the applicant $500 as compensation.
Robert Orr needs a Chinese Visa to enter UN's DC2 building
Rio+20: GreenPeace Statement
Greenpeace International Executive Director has released a statement on his views of Rio+20. "The future we want has gotten a little further away today. Rio+20 has turned into an epic failure, It has failed on equity, failed on ecology and failed on economy" were Kumi Naidoo frank comments after the text for the outcome document was adopted. Please click here for the full statement.
UN Policy Coordination on the Road
DESA's Telecommuting Assistant Secretary General
Sha Zukang's behavior not appropriate...
Sha's behavior was not appropriate as a senior advisor. And he also knows that his behavior has embarrassed most of the [other] senior advisors at that time.
Mr. Chance (buy this book now)
Click on the picture and purchase this book now. It's already a best seller. It shows the coward Ban Ki Moon and his Korean team in action.
Chinese Social Affairs Department
"UN needs complete leadership overhaul"
International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell, who asked Ashdown to carry out the report, said the government would give its response in about six weeks.
Czech President Klaus
"...this is the time for international organizations, including the United Nations, to reduce their expenditures, make their administrations thinner, and leave the solutions to the governments of member states"
Sha Zukang Disrespectful of UN Rules
UN staff rules require employees to uphold and respect the principles set out in the Charter, including faith in fundamental human rights. They prohibit U.N. employees from accepting instructions from any government or from any other source external to the organization. UN staff should avoid any action and, in particular, any kind of public pronouncement that may adversely reflect on their status, or on the integrity, independence and impartiality that are required by that status.
Barack Obama on UN Reform
Obtain Refund of Funds Owed to the U.S. by the U.N.
CLICK ON VOTE - to save approximate $180 million in one time savings
Get ready U.N. !!
Let's raise our voices
The following months are critical. Changing DESA is in your hand. Speak up now and share our message with all colleagues.
NyTimes disavows Ban Ki Moon
"The United States, meanwhile, should think hard about whether it wants to support Mr. Ban’s re-election" NyTimes Editorial - Nov 03, 2010
Feel like saying smth ?
You are free to respond to any of our critics. Send an email at - firstname.lastname@example.org - your reply will be published as is
UN at 65
State Department Spokesperson P.J. Crowley
"Sha Zukang seems to be cranky at lots of folks. It will not affect our relations with China."
UN STAFF RESOLUTION ON BAN KI MOON
If SG Ban Ki-moon fails to take immediate steps towards real reform to address these urgent systemic issues, Staff Union will consider a vote of NO-CONFIDENCE
Backstabbing for Beginners
Backstabbing for Beginners is at once the darkly comic tale of one man's political coming of age and a stinging indictment of the hypocrisy that prevailed at the heart of the world's most idealistic institution.
Hacked Emails Show Blatant Climate Change Fraud
anyone who wants to report facts in our Blog is welcomed. You can send us anonymous messages thru leaving comments into our past blogging or you can send us an email at: email@example.com. We ensure full confidentiality of your reporting.
What will this successful Chinese Diplomat do different?