Thursday, 13 January 2011

Was the U.N. Protecting Phony Treaties?

Fox News - Fair & Balanced

by George Russell at FOXNEWS.COM (CLICK HERE FOR STORY ON FOXNEWS)


The controversy involving a United Nations-affiliated organization that uses members of President Barack Obama's Kenyan family to tout its anti-hunger campaign deepened this week, when Fox News learned that the two treaties upon which the group bases its U.N. credentials may be fakes.

The government of Italy, which supposedly signed the treaties used to give the organization international standing, told Fox News this week that it never did so. And neither treaty is included in a database maintained by Italy's Foreign Ministry of treaties that Italy considers binding and valid.

Fox News questions to the U.N. about the matter earlier this week produced one immediate result: by January 13, the two documents had disappeared from the U.N.'s official registry of international treaties, where they were installed in 2001, as ordered by the U.N. Charter itself, which ordains in Article 102 that "Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations...shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it."

Fox News' latest series of questions to the U.N about the treaties were sent on the morning of January 12.

But the sudden disappearance of the documents only added to the questions surrounding the treaties and the U.N.'s custodianship of them. Diplomatic sources tell Fox News that the U.N. has known that Italy views the treaties that it supposedly signed as phony for nearly two years—since February 26, 2009, when Italy formally requested that the U.N. remove its name from the documents. Only after Fox News initiated its latest queries did the U.N. do so.

Italy's desire to have its name removed may well have been part of the vanishing official record too, since archival records previously obtained by Fox News show that a "communication" from Italy was registered with the treaty on February 27,2009—the day after Italy's Foreign Ministry delivered its removal request . (Fox News weeks ago asked the U.N. treaty collection for a copy of the "communication" but got no reply.)

Click here for the record of the "communication"

On January 12, diplomatic sources had told Fox News that Italy was continuing to pursue its campaign that the U.N. correct its official record through discreet diplomatic channels, with the aim of having its name completely erased from the documents.

Adding further to the mystery, diplomatic sources tell Fox News that it was the U.N. itself that first raised questions with Italy about the treaties and the organizations they create, back in October, 2008. The exact nature of that communication remains confidential.

How did the tainted treaties become part of the world's most important legal record in the first place? What did the United Nations know about them before Italy did?

Fox News has asked these and a number of related questions of the U.N. Secretariat over the past several days, but has not yet received replies.

The strange case of the tainted treaties adds a new dimension to the controversy surrounding the Intergovernmental Institution for the Use of Micro-Algae Spirulina Against Malnutrition (IIMSAM), which claims its main purpose is to make spirulina, a type of algae, "a key-driver to eradicate malnutrition, achieve food security and bridge the health divide with a special priority for the developing world and the least developed countries." Fox News first raised questions about the organization's supposed connection to the United Nations earlier this year.

IIMSAM has reinforced its claim of U.N. affiliate status with a steady flow of press releases since 2006, urging support for its work; extolling the health and nutritional advantages of spirulina platensis, a common algae that is used as a dietary supplement and fish food; issuing elaborate statements on various U.N. issues; and announcing partnerships and projects involving various organizations, corporations international institutions and individuals—including the Obama family. IIMSAM claims an office address in Rome and maintains a suite of offices in mid-town Manhattan.

IIMSAM has habitually claimed that it is "registered under the United Nations Treaty Series Number 37542-37543 dated 7th of June 2001," which are the index numbers in the U.N. Treaty Collection for the documents rejected by Italy.

It has sporadically issued press releases announcing new adherents to the "IIMSAM treaty," which do not show up in the U.N. registry. In May, 2009, for example, it announced that Kenyan Foreign Minister Moses Wetang'ula had done so, resulting in "IIMSAM’s full diplomatic recognition by Kenya."

It has also, in the past, claimed among other things that it carried out operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the aid of such organizations as the European Commission's Humanitarian Aid department. When contacted by Fox News, the office of the E.C.'s Humanitarian Commissioner, Kristalina Georgieva, denied ever having had contact with IIMSAM under any circumstances.

IIMSAM not only advertises that President Obama's grandmother, Sarah, and his uncle, Saidi, are "goodwill ambassadors" for the organization, but told Fox News in an interview last month that President Obama himself knows about IIMSAM and his family’s involvement. The White House has denied any knowledge of the organization.

After Fox News publicized the White House position, IIMSAM removed a photo from its website showing a youthful Barack Obama with his grandmother in Kenya, but continues to tout the Obama family connection. The Obama photo currently remains in a video clip extolling spirulina on the IIMSAM website.

IIMSAM claims something called "de facto diplomatic status on U.S. soil," something a State Department official told Fox News he had never heard of.

IIMSAM also has claimed on the home page of its website that it is a "Permanent Observer to the United Nations Economic and Social Council" (ECOSOC)—a designation that does not exist. To date, the U.N. has not answered questions from Fox News about what it is doing to prevent IIMSAM from using the fictitious designation.

Early on the morning of January 13, however, IIMSAM abruptly took down the claim of that status from its home page, but left the claim in a letter to readers on the same page.

Click here for IIMSAM's previous "permanent observer" home page

However, IIMSAM is officially listed on U.N. records as an ECOSOC intergovernmental observer "on a continuing basis," alongside such well-known institutions as the Organization of Petroleum-Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the U.N.’s own World Tourism Association.

Click here to see the record of IIMSAM's ECOSOC status

Such credentials are not permanent; they must be periodically renewed by the U.N., on the basis of the intergovernmental treaties that establish them. They involve the U.N. Secretariat's Office of Legal Affairs, whose job description includes "preparing agreements and other legal instruments regulating relations of the United Nations with Member States, intergovernmental organizations, non-governmental organizations and other legal entities."

Italy's Foreign Ministry told Fox News that it had never received any communication from the United Nations about IIMSAM or the controversial treaties prior to 2008.

IIMSAM's current ECOSOC status gives it the right to attend and submit its views where relevant at the Council ‘s meetings and forums, and at other U.N. gatherings that recognize ECOSOC observers. It also gives the organization a profile and prestige with governments and institutions around the world that it would otherwise not have.

All of those activities derive from IIMSAM’s claimed role as a U.N.-endorsed "intergovernmental organization"—which in turn is bestowed on the basis of the treaties that Italy says it never signed.

How IIMSAM got its "continuing" observer status on the basis of the treaties is yet another mystery, since neither document mentions IIMSAM specifically by name. According to the document registered with the U.N. Treaty Collection as Treaty No. 37542, an institution called the "Intergovernmental Institution for the use of Micro-alga Spirulina (Spirulina Program) is designated as an "affiliated body" to yet another organization called the Collaborative Inter-governmental Scientific Research Institute (CISRI), whose creation is the main aim of the treaty.

A second treaty, No. 37543 in the U.N. registry, announces creation of "The International Centre for Food micro-alga against Malnutrition (ICFAM), with "the goal to promote study and production of food micro-algae in favor of people in need." A second institution, the "Intergovernmental University Institution of Cooperation," is also created. Once again, CISRI is prominently named, as the "depositary" of the treaty.

Click here for the treaties

The second treaty is also contains a subtle mechanism: it only goes into effect when the fifth country signs it. In this case, the fifth signatory is Italy. This raises the intriguing possibility that if Italy's inclusion is invalid, the entire treaty is invalid—a kind of legal ghost in the U.N.'s records.

On its own website, CISRI positions itself amid a smog of techno-verbiage that could mean almost anything, or nothing. Its function, CISRI says, is to "promote scientific research, initiatives and education in favor of international cooperation, both at technical and advocacy levels and represents a platform of institutional relevance for the issues related to international and development cooperation." Other statements may indicate the website has not been updated since 2008.

CISRI also claims that it is a member of the Global Compact of the United Nations, which is a U.N.-sponsored "strategic policy initiative for business" that aims to garner corporate-sector adherence to U.N. objectives.

A Global Compact spokesman confirmed that CISRI became an NGO ("non-governmental organization") participant in June, 2005, and said that "we haven't had any contact or relationship with them since."

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News

Can UN Women Reverse the United Nations' Absent-Minded Approach to Gender Equality?

The Huffington Post (click here to view this on The Huffington Post)


On the first day of the New Year, history was made when the newest agency of the United Nations, UN Women, became operational with a mandate to promote gender equality and the empowerment of women. The new agency launched pretty quietly with no major celebration, despite representing a major step in the right direction for the United Nations, which has not made enough progress to advance gender equality.

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is rightfully taking heat after failing to mention UN Women in a year end op-ed for the Sydney Morning Herald. He also acknowledged all of the Millennium Development Goals with the exception of MDG 3, to promote gender equality and empower women, leaving many to question how committed the United Nations really is to gender equality and the new UN Women agency.

In an open letter entitled "UN Women's First Hurdle: Educating Ban Ki-moon," Paula Donovan and Stephen Lewis of AIDS-Free World expressed concern over the omission of UN Women in Ki-moon's op-ed:

The Secretary-General speaks of the challenges and struggles of the United Nations as it enters the New Year. It would have been a tremendous opportunity to draw attention to UN Women... after all, the creation of an entirely new agency devoted to half the world's population is something to be noted and celebrated. But there's not a word on UN Women.

More alarming than the lack of hoopla surrounding the launch of UN Women is the fact that the United Nations thinks it is progressing towards gender equality and the empowerment of women when women are rarely appointed to leadership roles within the agency. The United Nations has never appointed a female Secretary-General since its inception in 1945.

Even after the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1325 in 2000, which intended to amplify the role women play in resolving conflicts, women have only made up seven percent of negotiators in major United Nations peace talks over the past decade. Yet women are still the victims of an overwhelming amount of violence, particularly in conflict zones. The United Nations could demonstrate a stronger commitment to gender equality by first ensuring that men and women have equal representation at peace talks and throughout decision making processes.

Appointed Executive Director of UN Women and former President of Chile, Michelle Bachelet, has many challenges ahead, but she is a charismatic and strong leader who could have made a superb replacement for Ki-moon when his term ends at the end of this year. If anyone can lead UN Women towards real progress concerning gender equality and championing the rights of women worldwide, Bachelet can, and I, for one, hope she has the full, unwavering support of the United Nations and the Secretary-General.

Follow Natalie MacNeil on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nataliemacneil

UNFCU - the U.N. Bank to step in to "fill the void" created by CHASE and other U.S. Banks decision

latest decision by US Banks like Chase Manhattan not to do business with Diplomats and their Missions in New York and Washington DC, has led the board of UNFCU to turn their heads into the new lucrative business - that of Diplomatic Banking.

As one staffer of UNFCU phrased it: " once you get those accounts on board you're pretty much untouchable..".

Well the reason behind CHASE's decision was:

J.P. Morgan Chase to end services for diplomats; other banks ready to follow

... The Obama administration has said it has no authority to require private commercial entities to do business with foreign banks. But under a 1947 U.N. agreement, the United States, as the United Nations' host country, is obliged to ensure that foreign missions have access to "necessary public services."

Kennedy said the State Department is trying to persuade banks that have cut off service to diplomats to reconsider their decision and to persuade other banks to get into the business. From WashingtonPost


So now the UNFCU - which should have focused its mandate in providing quality services for UN staffers and their earnings/savings, now want to venture in areas that could potentially lead to major legal implications with the host country(s).

Monday, 10 January 2011

Dambisa Moyo: without change US will almost certainly become a socialist nation

Click here for story on Telegraph.co.uk

Economist Dambisa Moyo predicts in her new book that the West's economic dominance will collapse unless some very difficult choices are made.


Economist Dambisa Moyo predicts in her new book that the West's economic dominance will collapse unless some very difficult choices are made.

9:30PM GMT 08 Jan 2011

Dambisa Moyo is that rare type of person – an economist who makes waves. Her first book, Dead Aid, angered many in the charity sector by arguing that foreign aid has harmed Africa and should be phased out.

Her second, which is published in London on Thursday, accuses America and other Western powers of squandering their world economic dominance through a sustained catalogue of fundamentally flawed policies.

How the West Was Lost: Fifty Years of Economic Folly – And the Stark Choices Ahead goes so far as to predict that the US will be a “bona fide socialist welfare state” by the latter part of this century.

“Indeed, if nothing else changes it from its current path,” writes Moyo, “it is almost certain that America will move from a fully-fledged capitalist society of entrepreneurs to a socialist nation in just a few decades.

“The trouble is, it won’t be just any socialist welfare state... the US is on a path to creating the worst and most venal form of welfare state [poorly developed and designed] – one born of desperation from many years of flawed economic policies and a society that rapaciously feeds on itself.”

There’s plenty more. If current trends continue unabated, Moyo goes much further than the usual surveys predicting when China will surpass the US in GDP – she suggests China’s new hegemony could include the “redback” renminbi replacing the “greenback” dollar as the world’s favourite currency.

“Think about it,” she urges Americans. “Foreign exchange share prices, the price of copper, the price of oil, all in Chinese renminbi.”

The US and other Western powers will be reduced to second division players and the new global powerhouses will not just be China. Forget East versus West. It’s now the Rest versus the old West.

If Dead Aid was labelled “provocative and incendiary”, How the West Was Lost will likely see reviewers’ lexicons raided for even more emotive language. However, Zambian-born Moyo, 41, is not afraid of being a pioneer. The London-based former Goldman Sachs economist is arguably one of the most powerful women in British business, sitting on the boards of FTSE 100 constituents Barclays and brewing giant SAB Miller.

Last year, she featured in Time magazine’s list of the world’s 100 most influential people and also appeared in Oprah Winfrey’s power list of “20 remarkable visionaries”. She is also one of the World Economic Forum’s “young global leaders” and last year took part in the power-broking Bilderberg Conference, frequented by the world’s movers and shakers.

So what has led her to aim fire at the West’s leaders, struggling as they are with budget deficits and waning economies? The answer, she says, is that she believes the global economy is at an inflexion point in terms of where it goes from here.

“I wanted to write a book that is one-stop shopping for where we are in the world today,” she says. “There’s so much focus on dealing with tactical issues to do with the emergency solution, which are all necessary of course. But people are missing the bigger issues because the way the political structure is set up encourages you to focus on the immediate, rather than what I would say are the important issues, the structural things which have been going on for 50 odd years.

“I hope the book will be picked up by people who are saying: ‘I don’t want to hear all this noise. I just want a clean perspective on what the heck is going on around the world and how is it that we have got to this point.’ ”

So how have we? Apparently with the best of intentions. Moyo says the idea of unintended consequences is a running theme in both Dead Aid and How the West Was Lost, with policies that Western populations have rallied around as great ideas turning out to produce detrimental results.

In this way, she says, Western governments have implemented laudable notions like the idea that everyone should have a roof over their head, receive access to food and be supported in old age

by pensions. These have led to unfortunate outcomes in terms of capital, labour and productivity, the key ingredients for economic growth.

It’s not just the US. “There are tons of examples of UK and European mistakes,” she says. “A classic one is pensions. That’s obviously not an America-specific thing. The British and European economies are suffering under the weight of what is to come. The next great Ponzi scheme after Madoff is probably pensions. Also, it’s not just the United States where performance is declining in a very detrimental and rapid way in maths and science and reading. It’s also very much a problem in the UK.

“And if you compare 1950-1980 with 1980-2000, in terms of GDP growth in the US and many European countries, it’s been exactly the same. Yet between 1950 and 1980, people were living in pretty protectionist regimes and between 1980 and 2000 there was much more capital and trade flows. In addition, real wages have been relatively flat in the US and Europe, so taken together you have a question about whether globalisation, which is another great idea on paper, has actually worked in practice. Has it helped Americans? Has it helped the British people?”

Is there still time to fix these problems? Yes, she says, but the choices are going to be very difficult and may need to be facilitated through political changes, for example in the terms of governments, so they have more incentives to think longer-term.

“We all know what the problems are,” she says. “Which is why I actually think the coalition Government is brilliant because so far they have been able to implement some of the hardest choices of the austerity measures in an environment where it’s much less politicised than if it was just a left-wing or right-wing government in power. You kind of need to strip out the politics.”

It also may require a change of mindset, with Moyo arguing that governments need people who are absolutely focused on long-term structural issues such as education, deficit management, energy, food commodities, longer-term productivity and infrastructure. “The problems have been highlighted but where’s the plan for those issues? There isn’t one.”

It’s these sorts of awkward questions that Moyo seems to most like posing. In Dead Aid she argued that more than $1 trillion of development aid from Western governments to Africa over the past 50 years has not helped Africa but has ruined it, with millions of people poorer because of aid.Destroying the myth that aid works, she said, means making charity history.

Former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan agreed, saying that Moyo made a compelling case for a new approach to Africa, while Rwandan president Paul Kagame bought copies of Dead Aid for his entire cabinet. Some others were not so complimentary, however, with David Roodman, a research fellow at the Centre for Global Development, calling the book “sporadically footnoted, selective in its use of facts, sloppy, simplistic, illogical and stunningly naive”. The pro-aid organisation ONE claimed Dead Aid was “reckless”.

Moyo is unmoved. “I was actually pleasantly surprised,” she says. “I thought it would be much more fractious and that there would be many more NGOs and governments that would be incredibly hostile to the message, but it was actually to the contrary.

“I think there’s clearly a fringe group. I can probably count on one hand the organisations that took a lot of offence and I would argue that many of them have a bigger agenda than trying to help resolve the Africa problem. But a lot of NGOs have approached me. Some asked me to join their boards.

“Many of them just asked for advice because they genuinely want to see a turnaround. I think there’s no doubt in anybody’s mind, whether you love or hate aid, that there’s clearly something wrong. There’s clearly a problem with a system that has not delivered economic growth and reduced poverty for 50 years. Nobody can tell me that things are working swimmingly in Africa. they ain’t.”

Born and raised in Lusaka, Moyo achieved a chemistry degree and MBA at Washington DC’s American University, a doctorate in economics from Oxford University and a masters from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government before working as a consultant at the World Bank and then for nearly a decade at Goldman.

“I don’t think my background in Zambia has really affected my lens because my classical training has been Western-style,” she says. “But it’s fantastically fortuitous to have been born African because I don’t feel I have a vested interest to the US or China or wherever.

I feel like I have an impartial perspective on the way the world works. Coming from a continent that’s arguably on the bottom rung, it’s just amazing to see how things operate.”

It certainly hasn’t stopped her from becoming a pronounced free marketeer.

“I think the markets can work in a managed way,” she says. “If they’re left to run rampant it’s obviously problematic, but I think they are the best way of delivering economic benefits and have been shown to be the method to generate the biggest economic benefits to the highest number of people.”

What does she make of the current furore over banker bonuses? “I think some of the proposals coming from Europe are quite interesting,” she says with understatement.

“I’ve seen that they’re going to require vesting schedules on how you get your bonus and there will be caps on what proportion you can earn in cash. There are some interesting things but bonuses are on the whole a red herring. They were an easy target.

“Yes, there might be a need to change things but I think there are more serious things to be addressed. It may be a negative externality of a system but they’re not illegal.

They’re the creation of a system and the only reason that government might be involved in this type of discussion is because they did bail out the banks.

“But beyond that what relevance is there to a broader economy which has some very serious problems in education and health care? I think they are more interesting [than those issues].”

That will please Barclays’ new chief executive, Bob Diamond, but Moyo won’t discuss her non-executive jobs or her time at Goldman, which she clearly doesn’t view as a “great vampire squid”, as Rolling Stone infamously described the investment bank.

She’s already focusing on her next book. Which urban myths does she want to demolish next? “I know what it will be about but I’m not telling,” she smiles.

First, she’ll have to deal with a backlash from proud Americans who don’t agree that the West has been lost.