Showing posts with label foreign aid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreign aid. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 April 2012

UK aid funded firms 'linked to Nigeria fraudster Ibori' - VIDEO

Britain's Department for International Development is accused of allowing tens of millions of pounds in UK aid to be invested in Nigerian money laundering fronts, BBC Newsnight has learned.

Thursday, 17 February 2011

WikiLeaks cables: millions in overseas aid to Africa was embezzled

In one of the worst cases, £1.2million given to Sierra Leone by the Department for International Development (DfID) to “support peacekeeping” was stolen by the country’s “top brass” and spent on plasma television sets, hunting rifles and other consumer items.

Other examples include £16.5million allegedly stolen by ministers in Uganda and £800,000 intended for schools in Kenya stolen by education ministers.

DfID is said to be fully aware of the thefts, but regards the losses as being “within reason”. Details of the embezzlement will reopen the debate over the Government’s decision to increase DfID’s £7.3billion budget at a time of cuts.

In August, 2009, a secret cable from the US embassy in Freetown reported “deep corruption” within Sierra Leone’s defence ministry, “primarily through pocketing of enlisted members’ salaries”.

June Carter Perry, the US ambassador, wrote: “The British envoy revealed that the GoSL (Government of Sierra Leone) demanded a $4 million [£2.46million] contribution from the UK for the Ministry of Defense to support peacekeeping.

“Upon examination, the British discovered that half of the funds were for the personal use of the minister [Palo Conteh] and top brass. Items such as 36 plasma TVs and hunting rifles for the minister’s own use were included.”

Two months later, the US embassy in Nairobi reported that £800,000 from two educational support programmes funded by DfID and the World Bank had been “misappropriated” by officials working for Kenya’s education ministry, leading to the suspension of 25 staff. Separately,textbooks valued at £10.6million had been “lost” to “fraud, theft, and destruction” over the previous four years.

The embassy noted: “The primary donor, DfID, is reviewing the issue but is not expected to pull funding from the program. DfID considers the Free Education Program to be a major success and the level of losses to be within reason.”

In January last year, senior Ugandan officials were accused of “misusing” £16.5 million allocated to help pay for the 2007 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting. US diplomats in Kampala noted that Britain was “deeply angered” by the scandal and was “seriously considering visa restrictions” on the men in question to punish them.

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

HuffingtonPost: Funding Our Enemies

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS ON HUFFINGTON POST

"Money is ammunition; don't put it in the wrong hands," Gen. David Petraeus famously said in an August guidance to NATO troops in Afghanistan. “And remember, we are who we fund.”

By that definition, however, we are our own worst enemies.

An October report from the Senate Armed Services Committee came to the startling conclusion that the military’s hired guns are fueling the very insurgency the military is there to fight:

The Committee's inquiry uncovered evidence of private security contractors funneling U.S. taxpayers dollars to Afghan warlords and strongmen linked to murder, kidnapping, bribery as well as Taliban and other anti-Coalition activities. It revealed squandered resources and dangerous failures in contractor performance, including untrained guards, insufficient and unserviceable weapons, unmanned posts, and other shortcomings that directly affect the safety of U.S. Military personnel.


The report highlighted two cases in particular, in which security contracting firms ArmorGroup and EOD Technology relied on personnel linked to the Taliban.

Among the report’s major conclusions:


• The proliferation of private security personnel in
Afghanistan is inconsistent with the counterinsurgency strategy

• Afghan warlords and strongmen operating as force providers to
private security contractors have acted against U.S. and Afghan
government interests

• U.S. government contracts for private security services are
undermining the Afghan government's ability to retain members of the
Afghan National Security Forces by recruiting men with Afghan National
Army and Afghan National Police experience and by offering higher pay

• Failures to adequately vet, train, and supervise armed security
personnel have been widespread among Department of Defense private
security contractors, posing grave risks to U.S. and coalition troops
as well as to Afghan civilians.