Click here to read full story on Hindustan times
The UN has more important issues to tackle. For instance, its High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, is fuming at human rights
violations in the Canadian province of Quebec, where the government
imposed a mild order to prevent disruptive assembly by student
protestors. Pillay was possibly perturbed that Quebec wasn’t dealing
with protestors in the manner sanctioned by Syria, or Iran.
It’s somewhat surprising that the UN’s human rights apparatus is
actually going beyond its focus on castigating Israel, to countries like
Canada, the US, or even India.
Though it doesn’t quite extend to matters like gay rights, as that
offends many member nations of the HRC. When the Council’s president
attempted to introduce that matter, a swift rebuke came from Zamir
Akram, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative in Geneva: “We are even more
disturbed at the attempt to focus on certain persons on the grounds of
their abnormal sexual behaviour.”
Meanwhile, the world busybody is causing other problems for countries
that actually recognise the normal meaning of human rights. Another
human rights champion, Cuba, sponsored a resolution to “right to peace”,
which winks at terrorists’ activities against “foreign occupation”.
India abstained at the vote, possibly because of the implications for
Kashmir. Co-sponsors of that declaration included well-known human
rights stalwarts like China, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Sudan and
Syria.
Of course, as far as these UN luminaries can see, there are no
terrorists. In fact, despite decades of effort, they still can’t define a
terrorist. It’s probably a task that’s deemed more difficult than the
positive identification of the Higgs boson particle.
Click here to read full story on Hindustan times
Saturday, 14 July 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment